Another mans studies

Kevin Loughrey is a retired mechanical engineer for the Australian Army. He worked in many other disciplines of engineering besides mechanical including electrical power, electronic (chip research and development) and chemical. He has looked in far greater detail than I have into COVID-19 and has some very interesting results. You can find his information on the virus in the following link:

A small cartoon from his site.

It’s not rocket science people.

“All that is necessary for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.” – by unknown.

These are the stats from the and from

The stats in Jan 2022

The following is a simplified version of the above table showing that the vaccinated are 2.2 times more likely to become sick than those with no dose or unknown dosage. The table also shows that the vaccinated are 3 times more likely to die.

Then the stats on the 23rd April 2022. However they left out the deaths.

The following is a simplified version of the above table showing that the vaccinated are 2.9 times more likely to become sick than those with no dose or unknown dosage.

They put the deaths in a different shaped table further down.

The following is a simplified version of the above table showing that the mostly older vaccinated are 3 times more likely to die than those with no dose or unknown dosage.

These stats below from the ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics)

Unless someone has evidence to the contrary, I’d suggest an immediate stop to all vaccinations.

In that I’d like to quote Richard Feynman from a lecture at Cornell in 1964: “If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong!” and here’s a lecture where he projects this:

So far to date no one has shown me evidence of the virus ever isolated on a (or from a) human specimen from any university or scientific institution that I can replicate through experiment.

10:14 3rd May 2022 – Article addition

Thinking through the above numbers, there is an argument to say that a weighting must be added for the overall population dose:no_dose ratio. Rather than acquire these numbers right now, I will just eliminate the need for this factor all together.

Please also note that all the way through this article I have included the spurious ‘unknown dosage’ group in with the no dose group, thus giving the ‘dose’ group a larger weighting.

To eliminate the overall population dose:no_dose ratio I will simply show the percentage of deaths for the dose group separate to the no_dose group and compare those percentages.

The deaths with the vaccine are still higher than the no_dose group even though in the latter graph only slightly. However for the general populous to inform me that the severity of the virus is less if the vaccine is injected does not correlate with the above evidence. The percentage of deaths should be considerably less to validate taking an untested vaccine.

As a side note I have now met four (4) people whom have lost an older family member within one week of having one of the variants of the COVID-19 vaccine. In two (2) of those cases cause of death was not noted as related to the vaccine. In one (1) of the cases the daughter of the deceased demanded an autopsy and was continuously refused. She said that the noted symptoms leading up to death and cause of death were not congruent with the official documentation of the event.

My opinion still stands. The vaccine must be halted until further testing is carried out.


This following reference link is easier to read viewed in desktop mode.

Where did Latin go?

Everything globally seems to point to the language Latin. However it does not seem to be spoken anywhere except courts of law and churches. Why is this?

I’ve pointers to Romansh in Switzerland being the closest language.
A quote from Wikipedia (not a reference, only a pointer to possible references) :
“Romansh is one of the descendant languages of the spoken Latin language of the Roman Empire, which by the 5th century AD replaced the Celtic and Raetic languages previously spoken in the area.”

Recently I’ve more or less thrown out all the traditional English dictionaries in favour of Blacks legal dictionary 1st edition and 4th edition. Blacks is the main dictionary used by law students in Commonwealth countries. 1st Ed. also points out the legal dictionary of equivalency in many other non Commonwealth countries. The thing is that a huge chunk (possibly half) of the definitions are in Latin. Why?

Unless a mandate is gratuitous, it is not a man-
date. Dig. 17. 1. 1. 4; Inst. 3, 27; 1 Bouv.Inst. n.

Now this stands up in a court of law in Australia as long as you specify to the judge that you want to be judged under contract law (The JurisPrudence of Equity).

Why are none of us taught Latin if it underpins the structure of the laws we all live by?

Would that mean that we as men and women can not even understand the written laws of our land?

Why is Romansh still only existing in the canton of Grisons?

Why do the priests etc. of the churches and lawyers get taught Latin?

Why do the law students at the presentation of their degree in England have the whole presentation in Latin when the country is so proud about being the origin of English?

Finding the virus

After a rather strong conversation with someone over the weekend, I sit here with my coffee this morning looking through university websites for the textbooks the lecturers recommend whom teach virology. To date I have absolutely zero evidence to prove that the Covid-19 virus has ever been isolated in the laboritory.

I’ve very limited time to do this research, however I am sick of wasting time in conversations with people telling me how bad this Covid thing is when they have no evidence. When I ask for evidence they send me a link to a media presentation of some sort. Now if I sited a media reference on any of my papers at university for a specific scientific subject, I am sure I’d get a snide chuckle from the lecturer (whom is a phd at the forefront of their field) followed by a big fat F on the paper.

Scratching around on the Australian university websites this morning I see that UQ has a course in virology. It says “There is no compulsory textbook, however those students who would like a general reference text are recommended to purchase: Cann, A.J. (2015). Principles of Molecular Virology. 6th edition. Elsevier”

Other books recommended are:

Flint, S.J. (2015) Principles of Virology. Vols I and II. 4rd edition. ASM Press.

Knipe, D.M. and Howley PM. (2013). FieldsVirology. Vols 1 and 2. 6th edition. Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins Publishers: Philadelphia. 

Hull, R. (2013) Matthews’ Plant Virology. 5th edition, Academic Press.

Flint, Racaniello, Rall, Hatziioannou, Skalka

Principles of Virology 5th Edition (multi-volume) 2020

Thus the next step is to sniff through these texts and find out how to isolate this virus if it exists.

If anyone can send me a valid university or lab paper successfully showing the isolation of covid-19 on a human specimen, please let me know and send me the evidence The evidence I will need to be able to replicate the isolate like any good man or woman of science would.

I have not been publishing my findings here to date because I did not want to waste my time trying to educate the people whom are not capable of seeing that the media is not the truth. Or waste my time in discussions with those whom are not capable of logic and basic problem solving. That includes the rationalisation of ones data set.

Of course my data sets could be wrong, but they are more legitimate than almost every one elses.

However I keep saying in conversation that the capable have a moral responsibility to protect the not capable and hence this post.

Thus hopefully I get the time soon to scour these text books for how to isolate a virus, test for one, then create a vaccine.